Обсуждение:Агностицизм

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Agnosticism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16Auto-archiving period: 90 days

	Agnosticism was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 10, 2014 Good article nominee Listed October 6, 2020 Good article reassessment Delisted
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 16, 2014. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the word "agnosticism" was coined by biologist Thomas Henry Huxley?
Current status: Delisted good article

This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Religion High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Atheism Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of atheism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AtheismWikipedia:WikiProject AtheismTemplate:WikiProject AtheismAtheism articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. For more information and how you can help, click the [Show] link opposite: If you would like to participate, you can edit this article and visit the project page. Quick help Project's main talk page Article layout Links to atheism-related information · List of free online resources Writing about religion · Article development Citing sources · Verifying sources · About original research Assume good faith · Be civil Recent activity Core articles the "Atheism" article Articles recently added to Category:Atheism To do edit history watch purge Join WikiProject atheism and be bold. Add a userbox to your page ({{User WikiProject Atheism}} or {{User WPA2}}) and attract potential members. Help with articles. See this month's adopt-an-article. Help out with this to-do list. Be consistent Use a "standard" layout for atheism-related articles (see layout style, "The perfect article" and Featured articles). Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or see info box) Ensure atheism-related articles are members of Atheism by checking whether [[Category:Atheism]] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it. Maintenance, etc. Find sources for all positions of an article (see Citing sources and atheism references). Try to expand stubs. Ideas and theories about life, however, are prone to generating neologisms, so some stubs may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process). Watch the list of atheism-related articles and add to accordingly. Always write for an encyclopedia. Articles to improve Agnosticism Create Articles on notable atheists Expand an atheism stub Immediate attention State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments. False choice into False dilemma: discuss whether you are for or against this merge here Clarify references in Atheism using footnotes. Secular movement defines it as a being restricted to America in the 21st century. Philosophy High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Theology High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. History Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Sociology High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

— Предыдущий неподписанный комментарий добавлен 2a02:2149:8286:5d00:fc1e:e047:b002:3866 ( обсуждение ) 12:55, 25 октября 2017 г. (UTC) [ ответ ]

Агностицизм — это не мировоззрение о метафизической реальности самого космоса, а состояние ума индивидуума или ограничение индивидуума. Это не тавтологично по отношению к работе космоса. «Ограничения индивидуума», как личностно, так и космически установленные, не являются «механизмом вселенной»; таким образом, агностицизм — это мировоззрение о мнениях индивидуума, а не о космической реальности. Возможная скрытая природа космоса — это не его единственный атрибут и не его глубочайший механизм. Агностицизм — это не чистейшая метафизика о космосе, но это чистая онтическая метафизика об индивидууме (мыслителе). — Предыдущий неподписанный комментарий добавлен 2a02:587:4115:e96c:88ea:a31a:74f3:a24c (обсуждение) 20:27, 21 июня 2020 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Первое предложение такое:

« Агностицизм — это взгляд или убеждение, что существование Бога, божественного или сверхъестественного неизвестно или непознаваемо » .

Однако это оставляет совершенно открытым вопрос о том, о чьих знаниях идет речь.

Здесь идет речь только о знании агностика? (Существование Бога неизвестно или непознаваемо для этого человека?)

Или эта цитата означает, что агностик верит, что существование Бога неизвестно или непостижимо для всех ?

Каким бы ни был ответ — одним из этих вариантов, или обоими, или чем-то еще — статья отчаянно нуждается в разъяснении. 2601:200:C082:2EA0:F171:81DE:843A:DA36 (обсуждение) 19:35, 27 апреля 2023 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Не следует ли добавить пункт о том, что агностицизм может означать «веру в то, что существование бога или богов лично непознаваемо» или означать апатию к религии без каких-либо утверждений о природе нашей реальности? Alexanderkowal (обсуждение) 09:41, 23 мая 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Это соответствует посту @2601:200:c082:2ea0:f171:81de:843a:da36 выше Alexanderkowal (обсуждение) 09:43, 23 мая 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]