Обсуждение пользователя:M@sk

Добро пожаловать!

Привет, M@sk, и добро пожаловать в Википедию! Спасибо за ваш вклад. Надеюсь, вам понравится это место и вы решите остаться. Вот несколько хороших ссылок для новичков:

• Пять столпов Википедии
• Как редактировать страницу
• Страницы помощи
• Учебник
• Как написать отличную статью
• Руководство по стилю

Надеюсь, вам понравится редактировать здесь и быть Википедистом ! Пожалуйста, подписывайтесь на страницах обсуждения, используя четыре тильды (~~~~); это автоматически выведет ваше имя и дату. Если вам нужна помощь, зайдите на Wikipedia:Где задать вопрос , спросите меня на моей странице обсуждения или разместите {{helpme}}на своей странице обсуждения, и кто-нибудь вскоре появится, чтобы ответить на ваши вопросы. И снова, добро пожаловать!  Kukini 06:11, 11 февраля 2006 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Я вижу, что вы работаете над несколькими статьями о мостах в Саскатуне и других местах Канады. Если вам интересно, вы можете заглянуть в Wikipedia:WikiProject Bridges , который является проектом по стандартизации статей о мостах и ​​улучшению качества этих статей. Я работаю над мостами Миннесоты в рамках проекта (хотя мне, вероятно, следует сделать перерыв; я, вероятно, отредактировал около 40 статей о мостах сегодня.) Загляните! -- Элкман - ^{(обсуждение)} 03:40, 30 апреля 2006 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Я исправил статью о мосте Виктория и сделаю другую в ближайшие день-два. Спасибо за совет. -- M@sk 00:14, 1 мая 2006 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Хорошая работа над статьями о мостах. Пожалуйста, уделите немного времени, чтобы отметить изменения, которые я и другие внесли в грамматику и орфографию в статьях. Предполагая, что вы будете создавать статьи о каждом мосте, обратите внимание, что я добавил один мост в список в главной статье о Саскатуне — железнодорожный мост Гранд Транк — плюс мост Идилвилд был переименован в мост Сидни Л. Бакволда около 6 лет назад, поэтому я соответствующим образом изменил это в статье. Ура. 23skidoo 06:05, 30 апреля 2006 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Спасибо за дополнения и правки. Возможно, пройдет несколько дней, прежде чем они все появятся, но таков был мой план. -- M@sk 00:15, 1 мая 2006 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Пожалуйста, не применяйте Category:Saskatchewan к статьям, которые уже находятся в подкатегориях, таких как Category:Universities and colleges in Saskatchewan — вся идея подкатегорий заключается в том, чтобы сделать их максимально незагроможденными, применяя только самые узкие подходящие категории, а не некий рекурсивный набор дублирующихся категорий. Bearcat 02:22, 18 мая 2006 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Можете ли вы улучшить/отредактировать/обновить эту новую статью, пожалуйста? Спорт в Саскачеване Я вижу, что вы отредактировали статьи о стадионе Гриффитс в Саскачеване. TXS SriMesh | talk 06:13, 5 августа 2007 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Привет, вам любезно предоставлено приглашение присоединиться к Saskatchewan WikiProject ! Saskatchewan WikiProject — это довольно новый WikiProject. Мы — группа редакторов, которые занимаются созданием, редактированием и расширением статей, списков, категорий и Wikiprojects, связанных со всем, что связано с Саскачеваном.

Мы с нетерпением ждем возможности приветствовать вас в проекте! SriMesh | talk 06:13, 5 августа 2007 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Теперь в галерее на странице обсуждения этой статьи есть изображения. Если они как-то пригодятся в статье... Я заметил, что вы добавляете информацию в статьи об авиалиниях... SriMesh | обсуждение 05:24, 10 мая 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]

На данный момент у меня нет хороших фотографий, но это была бы замечательная поездка на этих выходных. Забавно выкладывать фотографии Саскатуна в сеть, некоторые лучше других, но мне это нравится. Цифровые камеры — это здорово. Свяжусь с вами, как только выскочу туда. С наилучшими пожеланиями, SriMesh | talk 04:27, 21 мая 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Есть несколько фотографий в парке и зоопарке Forestry Farm, надеюсь, некоторые из них можно будет вставить в статью, которую вы начали, у которой, кстати, замечательное начало!! С наилучшими пожеланиями, SriMesh | talk 04:01, 24 мая 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Доставлен июньский информационный бюллетень, в котором объявлено о награде Spotlight, подпишитесь на Wikiproject Saskatchewan для получения дополнительных выпусков, если вы хотите продолжать их получать. SriMesh | talk 00:38, 2 июня 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]

→ Пожалуйста, направляйте все запросы на страницу обсуждения WikiProject.
→ Этот информационный бюллетень/релиз был доставлен ENewsBot · 11:23, 4 июня 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Извините, что вы получили два выпуска информационного бюллетеня, произошел сбой в системе доставки ботов, из-за чего июнь был задержан, поэтому были отправлены и ручная доставка, и доставка ботом. SriMesh | talk 17:28, 4 июня 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Пожалуйста, воздержитесь от введения неподходящих страниц, таких как Saskatoon Club , в Википедию. Это не соответствует нашим правилам . Если вы хотите поэкспериментировать, пожалуйста, используйте песочницу .

Если вы считаете, что это уведомление было размещено здесь по ошибке, вы можете оспорить удаление, добавив его в начало страницы, которая была номинирована на удаление (сразу под существующим тегом быстрого удаления или "db"), вместе с добавлением заметки на странице обсуждения , объясняющей вашу позицию, но имейте в виду, что после того, как статья была отмечена тегом быстрого удаления, если она соответствует критериям, она может быть удалена без задержки. Пожалуйста, не удаляйте тег быстрого удаления самостоятельно, но не стесняйтесь добавлять в статью информацию, которая сделает ее более соответствующей политике и рекомендациям Википедии. Наконец, обратите внимание, что если статья будет удалена, вы можете связаться с одним из этих администраторов и попросить отправить вам копию по электронной почте. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ ​​contribs} 17:27, 15 июня 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]{{hangon}}

Я восстановил статью на данный момент. Однако для ее значимости потребуются дополнительные доказательства, помимо ее возраста и простого существования. Я работаю с Национальным реестром исторических мест США — какой канадский эквивалент? Сейчас он кажется ничем не примечательным, и другие с этим согласны. Должно быть какое-то историческое событие, исторический реестр или подобное различие.

Вы проделали большую хорошую работу, но помните, что Википедия может быть жесткой средой - редакторы, которые отметили и удалили статью, поступили правильно, но я считаю, что статью можно улучшить и сохранить, если есть соответствующие источники . Пожалуйста, не позволяйте своему разочарованию привести вас к размещению неуместных сообщений в пространстве статьи. Acroterion _{(обсуждение)} 17:37, 15 июня 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Я номинировал Saskatoon Club , статью, которую вы создали, на удаление . Я не считаю, что эта статья удовлетворяет критериям Википедии для включения, и объяснил почему на Wikipedia:Статьи для удаления/Saskatoon Club . Ваши мнения по этому вопросу приветствуются на той же странице обсуждения; также вы можете редактировать статью, чтобы устранить эти опасения. Спасибо за ваше время. Вы хотите отказаться от получения этого уведомления? SchuminWeb ( Обсуждение ) 17:32, 15 июня 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Я надеюсь, что вы рассмотрите возможность продолжения работы в Википедии. Saskatoon Club comment . Вы внесли ценный вклад в понимание и статьи в Википедию в целом, а глупые AfD являются частью растущих проблем Википедии, устанавливающей доверие в целом в Интернете. Как отметили несколько человек, которые больше знакомы с Саскатуном и Саскачеваном, обсуждение продемонстрировало поддержку вашей работы. Мне жаль, я был болен, и мама была в больнице в это время, иначе я бы тоже добавил свои два цента. С наилучшими пожеланиями, SriMesh | talk 00:59, 21 июня 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]

		Премия «Исключительный новичок»
		Я, SriMesh , настоящим признаю ваш выдающийся вклад в Саскачеван, его Коронные корпорации и исторические здания. Хорошая работа

Спасибо за поддержку, я продолжу вносить свой вклад. Надеюсь, у вас и вашей семьи все хорошо. -- M@sk (обсуждение) 03:47, 21 июня 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]

→ Пожалуйста, направляйте все запросы на страницу обсуждения WikiProject.
→ Этот информационный бюллетень/релиз был доставлен ENewsBot · 12:47, 2 июля 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Привет, я заметил, что ты участник WP: Sask. Что ж, настоящим я приглашаю тебя в WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods . Если ты решишь присоединиться, мы с нетерпением ждем возможности приветствовать тебя в проекте. Г-н CC ( talk ) 02:05, 13 июля 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]

→ Пожалуйста, направляйте все запросы на страницу обсуждения WikiProject.
→ Этот информационный бюллетень/релиз был доставлен ENewsBot · 22:51, 1 августа 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]

→ Приносим извинения за задержку доставки, в последние несколько дней наблюдались серьезные сетевые проблемы на сервере бота.

→ Пожалуйста, направляйте все запросы на страницу обсуждения WikiProject.
→ Этот информационный бюллетень/релиз был доставлен ENewsBot · 09:49, 4 сентября 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]

→ Пожалуйста, направляйте все запросы на страницу обсуждения WikiProject.
→ Этот информационный бюллетень/релиз был доставлен ENewsBot · 11:40, 2 октября 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]

На Enerjet был помещен тег с просьбой о его скорейшем удалении из Википедии. Это было сделано в соответствии с разделом A7 критериев скорейшего удаления , поскольку статья, по-видимому, о компании или корпорации, но не указывает, как или почему тема важна или значима: то есть, почему статья об этой теме должна быть включена в энциклопедию. Согласно критериям скорейшего удаления , такие статьи могут быть удалены в любое время. Пожалуйста, ознакомьтесь с руководящими принципами относительно того, что обычно считается примечательным , а также с нашими руководящими принципами специфической для данной темы значимости для компаний и корпораций .

Если вы считаете, что это уведомление было размещено здесь по ошибке, вы можете оспорить удаление, добавив его в начало страницы, которая была номинирована на удаление (сразу под существующим тегом быстрого удаления или "db"), вместе с добавлением заметки на странице обсуждения , объясняющей вашу позицию, но имейте в виду, что после того, как статья была отмечена тегом быстрого удаления, если она соответствует критериям, она может быть удалена без задержки. Пожалуйста, не удаляйте тег быстрого удаления самостоятельно, но не стесняйтесь добавлять в статью информацию, которая сделает ее более соответствующей политике и рекомендациям Википедии. Наконец, обратите внимание, что если статья будет удалена, вы можете связаться с одним из этих администраторов и попросить отправить вам копию по электронной почте. —Largo Plazo ( обсуждение ) 12:50, 26 октября 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]{{hangon}}

Еще одна номинация на удаление. Я задаюсь вопросом, почему я должен вносить свой вклад в это сообщество, когда попытки сделать это таким образом отбиваются. Посмотрите на страницу обсуждения этой статьи. Какие критерии у нас в Википедии для добавления страниц об авиакомпаниях .... -- M@sk (обсуждение) 13:23, 26 октября 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]

См. WP:Notability , WP:Notability (компании) . В случае компаний, как и в случае с несколькими другими классами тем, статья должна *указывать*, что тема примечательна. Эта статья этого не делает, и вероятность того, что авиакомпания с одним самолетом будет примечательна, кажется небольшой. Относительно ценности вклада в это сообщество: я думаю, хорошо, что сообщество озабочено работой над качественной энциклопедией. Были установлены руководящие принципы на основе консенсуса, чтобы помочь в этом, предотвращая ее превращение в хранилище для рекламы, пропаганды, личных размышлений и т. д., и предотвращая большие объемы пространства, занятые темами с относительно небольшой ценностью. —Largo Plazo ( обсуждение ) 13:46, 26 октября 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Какие критерии вы предлагаете? Два самолета? 10? 100? Вы хотите усреднить вес, что Boeing 737 эквивалентен 4-5 пропеллерам или 1/2 широкофюзеляжного самолета? -- M@sk (обс.) 13:53, 26 октября 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Официального порога, основанного на количестве самолетов или весе, не существует. Я привел владение компанией одним самолетом как показатель того, что известность маловероятна. По большей части, покупка кем-либо какой-либо собственности (самолета, такси, ресторана, жилого дома) для использования в качестве заработка на жизнь не является темой, подходящей для включения в энциклопедию.

Я ответил на ваш предыдущий вопрос о применимых критериях, предоставив вам ссылки на две соответствующие статьи. Ответы там. Пожалуйста, прочтите их вместо того, чтобы пытаться превратить это в конфронтацию между вами и мной. Вы также можете посмотреть на WP:Welcome и WP:First статью . —Largo Plazo ( обсуждение ) 14:02, 26 октября 2008 (UTC) [ ответ ]

При удалении статьи вы также пропустили ссылку на странице аэропорта Эдмонтона. Я собирался добавить ссылку на странице аэропорта Форт-Мак-Мюррей, однако в этом нет смысла, поскольку авиакомпания явно не заслуживает упоминания в Википедии.

Надеюсь, вы не воспримете это как нападение на вас. Это не так. За последние несколько месяцев три мои статьи, включая эту, были номинированы на скорейшее удаление. В каждом случае люди тратят свое время на обсуждение преимуществ удаления статьи, а затем статья восстанавливается. На этом я сдаюсь. Очевидно, что сообщество Википедии не ценит усилия, которые некоторые из нас приложили, чтобы сделать эту энциклопедию более полной. Вы должны заметить, что я ждал, пока они получат одобрение от Transport Canada, прежде чем добавлять их, поскольку после получения лицензии за ними стоит некое содержание. Возможно, мне следовало подождать, пока они объявят о поставке своего второго или третьего самолета... В любом случае на этом этапе я предоставлю кому-то другому добавить статью, как только она будет соответствовать высоким стандартам заметности, которые, по-видимому, требуются. Я бы предположил, что включение их в список Canadian Airlines — это то, что Википедия отложит на плечи Transport Canada, но, вероятно, в таких случаях лучше быть заметными, а не полными. -- M@sk (обс.) 00:32, 27 октября 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]

→ Пожалуйста, направляйте все запросы на страницу обсуждения WikiProject.
→ Этот информационный бюллетень/релиз был доставлен ENewsBot · 06:17, 2 ноября 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]

→ Пожалуйста, направляйте все запросы на страницу обсуждения WikiProject.
→ Этот информационный бюллетень/релиз был доставлен ENewsBot · 00:10, 2 декабря 2008 (UTC) [ ответить ]

|}

→ Пожалуйста, направляйте все запросы на страницу обсуждения WikiProject.
→ Этот информационный бюллетень/релиз был доставлен ENewsBot · 08:08, 5 февраля 2009 (UTC) [ ответить ]

→ Пожалуйста, направляйте все запросы на страницу обсуждения WikiProject.
→ Этот информационный бюллетень/релиз был доставлен ENewsBot · 01:06, 1 марта 2009 (UTC) [ ответить ]

→ Пожалуйста, направляйте все запросы на страницу обсуждения WikiProject.
→ Этот информационный бюллетень/релиз был доставлен ENewsBot · 05:08, 4 апреля 2009 (UTC) [ ответить ]

|}

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 23:49, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 00:22, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 09:03, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 08:35, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 07:46, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 01:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to be creating more of these pages, you really should apply for |autoreviewer status. Eeekster (talk) 03:35, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 02:57, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I'm glad to see someone has taken an interest in historic Canadian railway stations. However, I've noticed that you've gone around and tagged a bunch of stations as being "national historic sites" that are really "designated heritage railway stations". There is a difference, and WP is the kind of place where we care about those kinds of little errors. Just a heads up. Otherwise, keep up the good work! --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 03:31, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm here about the same issue, as there are a number of "stations" added which are only flagstops - not even a building, just a spot where the train will stop (if asked). Even with larger towns than Cedarvale, British Columbia, e.g. Houston and Smithers, there's no need at all for a separate "station" article, the category can simply be added to the town article. Unless there's a notable building I see no reason whatsoever for "Houston (British Columbia) railway station", Cedarvale railway station, Telkwa railway station. All such articles should be merged with their placename counterparts, as they have no valid reason to exist; architectural, historical significance etc are why they would be notable enough to have separate articles; but even in Silverdale railway station (again just a flagstop, but where Billy Miner robbed the train]], there's no need for a separate article from Silverdale, British Columbia. Also there are doubled articles - there's already Boston Bar adn North Bend station articles without the VIA name in their title and they should be merged with the ones you've created; in those two cases, North Bend in particular, there were (and maybe still are, abandoned or in ruins) actual railway station buildings.Skookum1 (talk) 15:18, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Mission Harbour railway station got me curious, as the source says it's on Harbour Avenue in Mission, which is the waterfront; I haven't be in the home burg for a while but I can't see where this station would be, or what service it would be a station on, as the rail line adjacent to Harbour Avenue is the connector line to Abbotsford that uses the rail bridge. The old Mission CPR station, now a museum/cultural centre SFAIK, is on Railway Avenue, a couple of blocks west of teh West Coast Express station...but nowhere near Harbour Avenue.Skookum1 (talk) 15:18, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nomed this page for renaming. Just a heads up. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 01:12, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you are creating lots of stub articles about ferries in Saskatchewan. They may be better as one page titled Ferries of Saskatchewan rather than having all the stub article. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:54, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome back to the WikiProject Saskatchewan newsletter! I, User:Presidentman, am the new editor. You may see some changes due to the fact it's my first newsletter. I'm just going easy on myself, but it will get more complex as time goes on.

Member news The WikiProject Saskatchewan now has 45 members. The WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods has 13 members. The WikiProject Canada Roads/Saskatchewan has 7 members. Saskatchewan Roads and Highways To keep updated on proposals, deletion debates, etc. add {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News}} or {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News|right}} to your userpage to produce the box of notices in the above right. See this page for new areas of discussion: talk page WP SK roads

Welcome We’re excited to announce that User:Presidentman has joined WikiProject Saskatchewan as our Editor in Chief. Presidentman will oversee editorial content and the Saskatchewan Wikiproject community contributions on the Wikiproject newsletter. Presidentman has also successfully developed the Picture of the Day project and has been active on wikipedia for close to three years in a plethora of projects enriching wikipedia with close to 3,000 contributions. The transition between our old editor and the new has been smoother than any of us could have hoped for — SriMesh wrote their last newsletter article for January, 2010, and Presidentman started up without missing a beat for February 2010. The previous years for SriMesh, the past editor, had been richly rewarding, seeing subscriptions grow, informing interested editors of developments and changes to the Saskatchewan wikipedia community and supporting activities on the Saskatchewan Wikiproject. It is now time for me to move to new writing projects to finish, and further responsibilities which are vying for my attention. Please join me in welcoming Presidentman to the their new position! Presidentman is working on a host of new features and an updated look, which will take things to a new level. It is wonderful to have a new editor to bring in the new year! Expect great things. Welcome Presidentman, and best wishes! Your wonderful act of kindness to take on editorial capacity of the Saskatchewan Wikiproject news letter is much appreciated! Thank you so much!!! Kind Regards,SriMesh | talk 18:36, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recruitment We need to begin recruiting membership & spreading the word about our WikiProject. Help out! The best way to do this is the place the invitation letter on an editor's talkpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 01:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Member news The WikiProject Saskatchewan has 45 members. The WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods has 13 members. The WikiProject Canada Roads/Saskatchewan has 7 members. Saskatchewan Roads and Highways To keep updated on proposals, deletion debates, etc. add {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News}} or {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News|right}} to your userpage to produce the box of notices in the above right. See this page for new areas of discussion: talk page WP SK roads

Recruitment We need to begin recruiting membership & spreading the word about our WikiProject. Help out! The best way to do this is the place the invitation letter on an editor's talkpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 09:25, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have created articles for dozens of railway stations throughout western Canada and now you are doing some for Rocky Mountaineer. For VIA you used "Infobox station" but for RM you are using "Infobox Historic building". Was there some reason for this? I have changed the infobox for Rocky Mountaineer Station and created a Rocky Mountaineer style. The gold colour is exactly the same as the logo, which I have also uploaded. The style can be changed if you think it is not suitable. Thanks for the work you have done. Secondarywaltz (talk) 20:33, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome back to the WikiProject Saskatchewan newsletter. Sorry about the last two months, I have just been very busy with exams and the end of my studies. Now that summer is here, hopefully I'll do better.

Member news The WikiProject Saskatchewan now has 45 members. The WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods has 14 members. The WikiProject Canada Roads/Saskatchewan has 7 members. Saskatchewan Roads and Highways To keep updated on proposals, deletion debates, etc. add {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News}} or {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News|right}} to your userpage to produce the box of notices in the above right. See this page for new areas of discussion: talk page WP SK roads

Recruitment We need to begin recruiting membership & spreading the word about our WikiProject. Help out! The best way to do this is the place the invitation letter on an editor's talkpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 10:17, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I created Template:Rocky Mountaineer style, while you in your great wisdom following on behind decided to name your templates "RockyMountaineer" (without the space) WTF? The article is Rocky Mountaineer. I have now renamed that first template to match as Template:RockyMountaineer style. Please change any new infoboxes. Are you going to create North Vancouver railway station? Thanks for all your work anyway. Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:37, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that I don't know what I was thinking. I should have made the names consistent with the one you started. I am going to create a North Vancouver Station article. --M@sk (talk) 23:16, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is the Whistler Mountaineer? Should that article be renamed Whistler Sea to Sky Climb? Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At one point in time the run up to Whistler was advertised and sold as the Whistler Mountaineer. I need to check to see if they are still doing that. I don't think so. --M@sk (talk) 23:16, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you have also named all the RM routes in the succession boxes in the station infoboxes without spaces. You should use the full correct name as on the website. Secondarywaltz (talk) 23:44, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to the WikiProject Saskatchewan newsletter. Happy Canada Day to all!

Member news The WikiProject Saskatchewan now has 45 members. The WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods has 14 members. The WikiProject Canada Roads/Saskatchewan has 7 members. Saskatchewan Roads and Highways To keep updated on proposals, deletion debates, etc. add {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News}} or {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News|right}} to your userpage to produce the box of notices in the above right. See this page for new areas of discussion: talk page WP SK roads

Recruitment We need to begin recruiting membership & spreading the word about our WikiProject. Help out! The best way to do this is the place the invitation letter on an editor's talkpage.

Happy Canada Day July 1 is Canada Day! Everyone have a happy Canada Day!

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 11:02, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to the WikiProject Saskatchewan newsletter. Happy Saskatchewan Day to all!

Member news The WikiProject Saskatchewan now has 45 members. The WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods has 14 members. The WikiProject Canada Roads/Saskatchewan has 7 members. Saskatchewan Roads and Highways To keep updated on proposals, deletion debates, etc. add {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News}} or {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News|right}} to your userpage to produce the box of notices in the above right. See this page for new areas of discussion: talk page WP SK roads

Recruitment We need to begin recruiting membership & spreading the word about our WikiProject. Help out! The best way to do this is the place the invitation letter on an editor's talkpage.

Happy Saskatchewan Day August 2 is Saskatchewan Day! Everyone have a Happy Saskatchewan Day!

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 10:15, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to the WikiProject Saskatchewan newsletter. Happy Labour Day to all!

Member news The WikiProject Saskatchewan now has 46 members. The WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods has 14 members. The WikiProject Canada Roads/Saskatchewan has 7 members. Saskatchewan Roads and Highways To keep updated on proposals, deletion debates, etc. add {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News}} or {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/News|right}} to your userpage to produce the box of notices in the above right. See this page for new areas of discussion: talk page WP SK roads

Recruitment We need to begin recruiting membership & spreading the word about our WikiProject. Help out! The best way to do this is the place the invitation letter on an editor's talkpage.

Happy Labour Day September 6 is Labour Day! Everyone have a happy Labour Day!

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 06:39, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've linked to Cottonwood, but this is a disambig page, just letting you know seeing as you are the only contributor. Thanks, ConconJondor (talk) 15:41, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I made a few edits to Yorath Island, which included rewriting the references. You can go to edit mode to see exactly what I did. I recommend you have a look at Wikipedia:Citation templates - a particularly useful one is {{cite web}}. Not only do they make the references clearer, they also assist bots that look for dead links and salvage the reference with archive URLs. In the meantime, keep up the good work! --Drm310 (talk) 15:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you want to re-use an existing citation further down the page, here's how to do it:

1. In the first instance of the citation, make sure it has a name enclosed in quotes, e.g. <ref name="citation1">{{cite web ...
2. Further instances of the citation can be used with this syntax: <ref name="citation1" />

Note the use of quotes, the space after and the trailing slash. That's the proper syntax so you don't need the </ref> tag. In the Reflist, the citation will appear with small letters (e.g. ab), where each one will jump to the appropriate place where the citation was used. You can read more about it at WP:REFNAME... hope that helps. --Drm310 (talk) 17:40, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello M@sk! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Looking at this edit, where you add Queen Elizabeth II Court in Regina to a list of structures named after Queen Elizabeth II, is there anything odd about it, causing another editor to revert you twice? It seems pretty straightforward to me, and I'm always keen on defending good work. --Pete (talk) 00:26, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me. Not certain what the problem is. Thanks for point that out..... M@sk (talk) 02:07, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I just wanted to check in case I'd missed something. I've added a few more Canadian buildings named after the Queen, fixed a redlink or two. --Pete (talk) 02:40, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, M@sk, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Avord Tower, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! noq (talk) 12:50, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article C.M. Fines Building has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 12:50, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article University Heights Square has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable mall.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 06:52, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article University Heights Square is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University Heights Square until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 23:00, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kindersley Mall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I cannot find sufficient notable independent, substantive, multiple RS coverage of the notability of this 15-store, 131,000 sf mall on gnews or gbooks. Though it does have run-of-the-mill coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 11:39, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi M@sk,

Back in December, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, which was part of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at mpinchukwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:53, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Qwanlin Mall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qwanlin Mall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 06:50, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You, being the main contributor to List of mines in Canada, might be interested in my pet-project to organize, begin and determine lists of missing mines. I've created this userpage: User:ncboy2010/mines to attempt to organize what we do and don't have. Please take a look at that and let me know if there are anything I might be missing. The reason I ask you is because your one of the only other wikipedians who's worked on a list of mines before me. Thanks for any input! Ncboy2010 (talk) 17:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Temple REIT, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sheraton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Salmo railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Northern Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have redirected the Algoma Central succession templates to CN to be more inclusive. Another line Canadian National Railway operates is the Kaoham Shuttle in BC. Do you know of any more? This system can also be used for defunct or historic CN lines. It also seems more logical when AC now shows up as a line of the CN system, when previously it was a one-trick pony. Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:55, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What was wrong with Canyon (Agawa) railway station? Don't start making "stations" out of every flag stop and siding. It is just not helpful and they are not notable or stations. This Schedule show the difference. Notice Canyon station. Secondarywaltz (talk) 04:38, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. The station is in Canyon, Algoma District. Secondarywaltz (talk) 05:05, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eduroam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Mary's University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nipawin, Saskatchewan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cumberland College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Innovation Saskatchewan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agency (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have you attempted to contact the user? Ask him for clarification and re-create the articles after he tells you how to remedy it. Since they say "A7: Article about a company, corporation, organization, or group, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject" you ask him how it did not fulfill A7 and What you need to do to recreate the articles. You here to learn from this.WhisperToMe (talk) 01:27, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mask. I hope you don't mind this out of the blue question, but I'm not sure who else to ask…

I was flying from Toronto to Vancouver to do some skiing a few years back and I looked out the window to see what was clearly an abandoned railway line running to the northeast. This was way out in the middle of nowhere just after crossing the Ontario border (great view of the locks at the Sault as well!). There were no towns anywhere.. It paralleled the line to Churchill in basic direction. But this was much further south, I think I was basically parallel to Winnipeg.

Do any of your sources mention an abandoned line in that region?

Maury Markowitz (talk) 11:59, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article South Hill Mall (Prince Albert) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN mall. We don't generally have articles for malls of this small size, as generally they are not viewed as notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 01:00, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Town 'N' Country Mall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN 30-store mall.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 06:20, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luther Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luther Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ntb613 (talk) 17:17, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Retrocom Mid-Market Real Estate Investment Trust has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable investment trust. Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FuriouslySerene (talk) 15:38, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, M@sk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article VersaBank has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to cite references and fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Me-123567-Me (talk) 22:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, M@sk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Health regions of Saskatchewan, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  02:00, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Planet S is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet S until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:48, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yanke Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yanke Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BonkHindrance (talk) 03:59, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sawada Katsuo (talk) 06:42, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sawada Katsuo (talk) 06:42, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, M@sk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Finger station, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, M@sk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Budd station, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, M@sk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Finger station".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:08, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, M@sk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Budd station".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:08, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, M@sk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Finger station".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:57, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, M@sk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Budd station".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:57, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Silcox station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silcox station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Silcox (talk) 15:16, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wilde station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Turnbull station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rawebb station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Odhill station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article O'Day station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article M'Clintock station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:08, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lamprey station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:09, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Halcrow station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:11, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Earchman station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:13, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Charlebois station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:14, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Button station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:15, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Back station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:15, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Arnot station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable flag stop, literally just a post along the tracks.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:19, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arnot station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnot station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 03:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Back station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 03:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Button station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Button station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 03:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bylot station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bylot station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 03:53, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bridgar station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridgar station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 03:54, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lyddal station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyddal station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:00, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luke station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:02, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leven station (Manitoba) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leven station (Manitoba) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article La Perouse station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Perouse station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:04, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kettle Rapids station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kettle Rapids station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:07, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hockin station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hockin station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:09, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dyce station (Manitoba) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dyce station (Manitoba) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:11, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dunlop station (Manitoba) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dunlop station (Manitoba) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:13, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nonsuch station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

Статья будет обсуждаться на Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nonsuch station до тех пор, пока не будет достигнут консенсус, и любой, включая вас, может принять участие в обсуждении. Номинация объяснит политику и руководящие принципы, которые вызывают беспокойство. Обсуждение сосредоточено на высококачественных доказательствах и наших политиках и руководящих принципах.

Пользователи могут редактировать статью во время обсуждения, в том числе для улучшения статьи с целью устранения проблем, поднятых в обсуждении. Однако не удаляйте уведомление об удалении статьи из верхней части статьи, пока обсуждение не будет завершено.

– dlthewave ☎ 04:15, 19 августа 2023 (UTC) [ ответить ]