This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science
This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
NLTS was proven a few years ago
Article is in need of an update to reflect the proof of NLTS from a few years ago: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3564246.3585114 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:1C86:F00:ACC7:98D6:7E06:91B1 (talk) 03:05, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Lead is way too technical
Most readers will already be totally and irretrievably lost in the first sentence of the lead. --Lambiam 18:16, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you can figure out a simpler way to summarize the topic according to reliable sources, please do! The void century (talk) 18:36, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]