This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Jilcrester.
In Apple's press images it looks like the ram consists standard ECC-RAM modules in slots similar to those in the current Mac Pro which strongly suggests that it should be upgradeable. I would hold of on stating that it is not user upgradeable in the specs for now until we know for certain ;) 46.183.103.8 (talk) 10:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC) [1][reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
File:IMac Pro.svg - License is correct. Sticklers may say we need a photograph to ensure accurate representation, but looking at other images in the category, this is very representational. I hate that a product can be displayed accurately as an SVG — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Prose review
languished for years without any updates - While it probably felt like that for Mac users, this feels very purple (and therefore non-neutral). Should be rephrased
focus on dual graphics-processing unit (GPU) - is this missing an article? Or should dual graphics-processing unit be dual graphics-processing units?
I've made some edits; please review.
Earwig gives only 3.8% likelihood of copyvio, flagging only names and other elements that cannot be paraphrased. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review
Per WP:CITESTYLE, we should ensure that the referencing style is consistent. Consequently, the capitalization of the references should be made consistent (compare [1] and [2], [7] and [8], etc.)
Although it is not a GA criterion and does not affect the results of this review, I recommend archiving your online references to future-proof the article.
Please ensure references are in numeric order (note [7][6], [22][6], [22][8])
Spotchecks (based on this revision):
[2]
Supports: "new Mac Pro being developed", announcement of iMac Pro, small design focus on dual graphics-processing unit (GPU) had been a mistake
[5]
Supports: same chassis design as the 27-inch iMac (including screen etc.), jacks etc. (not cited for these, but supports them)
[16]
Supports: discontinuation and delisting; reviewing the article on MacRumours, despite the name it does appear sufficiently reliable for claims such as this.
Overall, this article and its presentation are excellent. Just a few nitpicks. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey User:Crisco 1492, thanks for the review. I’m currently traveling but will be back at a stable connection in about five days, and will jump in on the changes. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchstalk 10:58, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I believe that does. I'm happy to say that this meets the GA Criteria. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.